Wednesday, 2 March 2016

Best Seller

Best Seller
1.  John is hypocrite. Do you agree?
 Yes,
- made fun of romantic stories
-He had a romantic marriage.
- followed a girl whom he found in a train journey and got married.
2. Irony in the story ‘The Best – Seller’
-The story is full of ironical instances. The main protagonist of the story John denounces bestselling novels as something inferior to real life but we find that the story of his marriage is even more dramatic and adventurous than any fictional romance. He ridicules the story of Trevelyan’s romance for a princess by saying that he finds it difficult to believe that people would like to marry people from different strata of society or different background. According to him people generally marry people from same social circle, form the same background, or old school friends. Ironically, he himself marries a girl from aristocratic background, and goes to great extend to ensure that the marriage takes place. In fact even at the end he gets down at coke town to look for a petunia sapling for his wife just because she had admired it on a previous trip.

Keeping It From Harold

Keeping it from Harold
Characters:
Mrs. Jane Bramble
  • Good natured, Affectionate,
  • Very caring towards husband, Bill and son, Harold
  • Ever ready to hear Harold's Lessons/poem
  • Held truth as a principle of life
  • Sensitive to Harold's feelings- Told lie about Bramble's profession, felt he would be embarrassed to knew his father was a professional boxer
  • Extremely concerned about Harold's future- Not willing to give up the last fight as it would fetch them sufficient money to educate Harold.
Mr. Bill Bramble
  • Thirty-one year old, professional boxer but mild natured, obliging, fondly called 'young Porky';had now planned to give up boxing after the last fight at the national sporting club
  • yield to other's requests
  • gave his wife's desire to name son Harold
  • Jane, senir curate of parish and brother-in-law suggested he should not reveal his profession to Harold
  • agreed to hid his real profession from Harold
  • agreed  not to fight at the National sporting club
  • agreed to fight when asked by Harold to continue with his profession
before Harold was born
  • Was proud of being a professional boxer
  • enjoyed great publicity through newspaper
once Harold began schooling
  • kept his profession secret
  • told Harold he was a commercial traveller
  • decided to give up boxing and become an instructor
Harold
  • Child prodigy- seemed a class above parents
  • unlike parents- brilliant at school
  • focused- worked hard to attain perfection
  • meticulous- kept books and things in order
  • courteous- even shut doors softly
  • talented- sang in the choir, won prize for spelling and dictation
Major Percy Stokes
  • Mrs. Bramble's brother, belonged to salvation army
  • persuasive- persuades Bill to keep profession secret from Harold because he did not consider boxing a dignified profession
  • aggressive- compelled Bill not to fight against jimmy Murphy
Jerry fisher
  • Bill Bramble's trainer
  • did not allow people to meet people he trained
  • aggressive temperament- wanted to fight with Percy for influencing Bill
  • Revengeful- wished to avenge bill for letting him down,


1.What kind of boy was Harold.
-Intelligent boy – deep interest in academics.
- Self absorbed, self occupied- did not take much interest in his parents.
-interested in boxing, has deep knowledge about it.
2. Who was major Percy Stokes? What kind of man was he?
- Brother of Mrs. Bramble
- Trouble maker
- Seems to not have involvement in any constructive work..
- - Instigates Mr. Bramble into quitting boxing before the big fight.

3. Harold’s parents were too perceptive and concerned. Yet they failed to see the reality of their son’s interests. Bring out the truth of this statement by giving evidence from the text.

 Ans. Harold’s parents were extremely proud of his intelligence. They knew that he was a prodigy and were highly concerned that Bill’s profession should be hidden from him. They regarded him as a person showing a bit too much class for them. But they failed to see the reality of their son’s interests. This is evident from the reaction of Harold when he comes to know the reality. He cries and says that it was a rotten thing to hide everything from him. He tells them that he had a bet with his friend, Dicky Saunders, that Jimmy Murphy would not last ten rounds. Harold also tells Jerry that he’s been interested in all these things since he was a kid. He also says that all the fellows with him were very keen on discussing about the boxers' performances. Harold himself names the boxers one after the other, which amazingly shows his field of interest which his parents were completely unaware of.
4. Do you agree that Mrs Bramble is obsessed of dominating not only her husband but also her son?
I do believe that Mrs. Bramble is obsessed with dominating both her husband and her son. She refers to herself in the third person when she talks to her son. Harold doesn’t like this because he feels that she does so as she considers him a baby. While talking to her husband too, Mrs. Bramble is quite blunt. When she sees Bill who has come home while he was supposed to be training, she gets angry and says, “I want a plain answer to a plain question. What are you doing here, Bill, instead of being at the ‘White Hart?” When Bill tells her that he is not going to fight with Murphy, she’s furious and says, “How about the money?” She also says,“ Goodness knows I’ve never liked your profession, Bill ....” These instances show clearly that she fully dominates and controls the life of her husband too.

5. Give a character-sketch of Harold. OR Harold was just like any other child. How was his personality reflected in the end different from what you had read in the beginning? Discuss. [CBSE 2010 (Term-II)]

 Harold is just ten-years old, and for his age he has achieved far more. He is a ‘prodigy’, a child who has exceptional intellectual qualities, and so his parents regard him as ‘being of a superior order’. He is hard working and a brilliant student, who is devoted to his books. His behaviour is also exemplary, and he is a model of goodness and perfect intelligence. In spite of all this, he is not proud of his intellectual level. In fact, when he comes to know of his father’s boxing profession, the way he associates so much value to it, is amazing for everybody present there. He is an absolutely down-to-earth person, with no airs about himself. His character surely reveals that he believes in perfection and has a lot of respect for excellence, be it in the field of studies or sports. He is not a dumb bookworm, but an active and smart person who carries his own opinion, and knows how to express it too.
6. Do you think Bill Bramble was cut out to be a professional boxer on all counts?
Ans. Bill Bramble’s character reveals that to be a professional boxer one need not be violent in nature, specially with people in one's private life. So far as his profession was concerned, he was a tough boxer to fight with. This is evident from the admiration millions of people had for him, and from the way newspapers liked to cover his achievements. So his nature and his profession can be considered as absolutely contradictory to each other. But his ability to hit his fellow-man in the eye while apparently aiming an attack on his stomach, and vice versa, had won him laurels. Among the London’s teeming millions there was not a man, weighing eight stone four, whom he could not overcome in a twenty round contest. Thus in my opinion he was surely cut out to be a professional boxer on all counts.

7. Do you think that Harold’s parents did the right thing by hiding that his father was a professional boxer?
 The bond between parents and a child is not only very close and emotional, but also based on the firm ground of total trust. All ethics, values are imparted to the child by his parents. Love, tender care grows manifold as the child grows. In case of the Bramble family, they thrived in the glory of their prodigy–Harold. No wonder, Harold always performed better than their expectations. He was of keen intellect, winning prizes everywhere. In fact they basked so much in the sunshine of his achievements that they started getting an inferiority complex. They hesitated to do anything that would bring disgrace or make him feel that they were less respectable than others. Bill Bramble had immense pride in his boxing skills. Media, fame, money that once attracted him the most, faded away once Harold was born. They thought that boxing was uncultured, was meant for “men of wrath and they could never bring anything of this type to Harold’s notice. So began the season of deceit, hiding secrets, though it is all for their dear son’s welfare. In the process of hiding the truth, they end up hurting their son the most. Parent’s achievements means the world for the children. This falsehood had caused permanent scars on the psyche of Harold. He may not show, but deep within, he would never forgive his parents. In their over protectiveness, they had failed to note that Harold was a young boy, with natural craze for games and betting. He suffered due to peer-pressure; his natural desire was the subject of envy among his classmates, which his parents had deprived him of. So parents should be cautious, shield their child from problems, but not overshadow his growth. Honesty and trust are the most important factors for any relationship to grow.
8. How was Mr. Bramble’s nature in total contrast to his physical abilities?

Ans. Mr. Bramble was a successful boxer by profession, which requires immense physical strength to defeat the opponent. He was a tough fighter and was affectionately known to a large section of the inhabitants of London, as “Young Porky”. Among all London’s teeming millions, there was not a man, weighing eight stone four, whom he could not overcome in a twenty round contest. But Mr. Bramble’s nature was a total contrast to his physical abilities. In private life, he was the mildest and the most obliging of men, and always yielded to everybody. At one place in the story, the writer describes his walk as that of a ‘diffident crab’ implying that he did not have much self-confidence. His sensitive nature and sense of sacrifice for his son also show how soft he was at heart.
 9. Harold's reaction to Parent's sacrifice of truth

  • Harold was extremely disappointed that Bill's true profession had been kept a secret 
  • other children had autographs and pictures of famous boxers
  • he was mockingly called 'goggles' and wouldn't  be if children in school knew he was young Porky son
  • wished he had known his father was the famous professional boxer people talked about
  • felt cheated, wished he would continue boxing and win the match at the National sporting club he would feel proud to be called Young Porky's son

Tuesday, 1 March 2016

The man who Knew too much SA2 Notes

Notes for SA-II
The Man Who Knew Too Much
1. Character sketch of Private Quelch.
-Dedicated, committed and focused man.
-set his heart on becoming an army officer and getting a stripe and he left no stones unturned to achieve his goal.
- Borrowed the training manual and read it thoroughly, even staying late into night
-keen to acquit himself with all the aspects of army and would badger his instructor with all sorts of questions.
- Never tired or exhausted during marches
- Not popular because of his attitude of showing off and behaving ain a condescending manner.
- If anyone made any mistake he corrected them publically unmindful of their feelings.
-he offended corporal and sergeant (refer the text for the incident).
2. Private Quelch though knew too much could not win the admiration of his superior officers and colleagues. Why?
-Correcting colleagues publically
- If any one shown at his work, he outshone them.
- Always tried to patronise them.
- showed off his knowledge

Private Quelch’s knowledge :


About muzzle velocity:
Once a Sergeant was describing the mechanism of a service rifle, “The muzzle velocity or speed at which the bullet leaves the rifle is well over two thousand feet per second.” On this, The Professor interrupted and corrected the Sergeant, “Two thousand, four hundred and forty feet per second.”
After a thirty mile walk:
 The Professor used to drill with enthusiasm and was miraculously never tired after route marches and used to infuriate all with his horrible heartiness. Afterwards, he would say, “What about a song, chaps?” This was not greeted by anybody after a walk of thirty miles.

His salute on payday:
 The professor flashed a model to behold at the pay table. Always tireless, like a Guardsman, he would march and raise his skinny arms and flash a perfect salute whenever an officer was around.

The loud sound of a high flying invisible aeroplane:

The soldiers used to pride themselves on aircraft recognition. Once, while all were out for a walk, they heard the drone of a plane flying overhead. The sun was glaring and none of them could see the plane. But The Professor didn’t need even a sight of the plane and announced, “That of course, is a North American Harvard Trainer. It can be unmistakably identified by the harsh engine note, due to the high tip speed of the airscrew.” The rest felt like louts and felt out of place with Private Quelch.of peeling potatoes” wasted the vitamin values of the vegetable. The narrator and his friend heard and fled.

About hand grenades:

 One afternoon Corporal Turnbull was taking a session on hand grenades. The Corporal began by telling about how the outside of a grenade is divided up into a large number of fragments to assist segmentation. However, The Professor interrupted by pointing out with the exact number of fragments, which was 44, and went on suggesting that Corporal should have started his lecture by first explaining the five characteristics of the grenade. In reaction the Corporal let Quelch take the lecture. After The Professor was through and all had fallen in, Corporal Turnbull assigned Private Quelch, the permanent cookhouse duties. Of course, it was a joke for days afterwards; a joke and joy to talents.
-
During cook house duties:

One day while the narrator and his friend were returning from the canteen to the hall. They saw three cooks through the open door and they heard The Professor criticising the method of peeling potatoes. He was telling the other two cooks that their “abominably unscientific and unhygienic method


                                                                                                                                            

Preposition of Time

A number of prepositions may be used to denote time: from Monday; after my return; during the night; till tomorrow; before the bell rings; a quarter to ten.
In most cases, it is easy to decide which preposition to use. The following prepositions, however, need special attention.

1. At, on, in

(a) At usually denotes a definite point of time but can also be used for indefinite periods:
at 7 p.m.; at this moment; (Definite at midnight; point of time)
at the end of the class;
at night; at dawn; (indefinite at Durga Puja; at Diwali. periods)
(b) On is used with days and dates:
on Monday; on 1st May;
on the annual day; on a May afternoon.
(c) In is used with parts of the day, and with months, years, seasons:
in the morning; in September;
in 2004; in winter.
(d) In is also used with the future tense to show the period in which an action will happen:
in a week; in four hours.
(e) In and within. In means at the end of; within means before the end of:
I shall be back in a week. (when a week is over)
I shall be back within a week. (before a week is over)

2. By

By refers to a point of future time and denotes the latest time at which an action will be over:
The competition will be over by 6 p.m.
(It should be over before it is 6 p.m., but the latest time at which it can be over is 6 p.m.)
They will have declared the result by tomorrow evening.

3. For

For is used with periods of time to show the duration of an action. It is mostly used with perfect continuous tenses though it may be found with other tenses as well:This discussion has been going on for two hours.
I have worked in this office for two years.
For may sometimes be omitted also:
I have been busy the whole morning. (for the whole morning)

4. Since

Since marks the point of time at which an action began. It is used only if the action has continued till the time of speaking; hence it is found with perfect continuous tenses. Unlike for, it can never be ommitted:
She has been teaching in this college since 2001.
A cool breeze has been blowing since morning.

5. From

From denotes the starting point of an action and is used in all cases except when the action has continued till the moment of speaking. It is almost invariably used with to or till:
The examination will be held from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m.
He was the Chief Minister of the state from 1999 to 2002.

6. At, in

(a) At has the idea of an exact point and is, therefore, used with houses, villages, small towns. In has the idea of a larger area and is used while speaking of bigger towns, states, countries, etc.:
at Karol Bagh in New Delhi;
at Ambala; in England;
at the end; in the middle.
(b) At conveys the idea of a general neighbourhood; in conveys the idea of something contained:
We say at the table to take our lunch.
Please wait for me at the Regal PVR.
Turn left at the next crossing.
There are two Pepsi bottles in the refrigerator.
You will find the stapler in the drawer.

7. On, upon

On is used while speaking of things at rest; upon is used with things in motion:
The file is on the table.
The dog sprang upon the table.

8. Above, over

Both above and over mean higher than. Sometimes we can use either of them:
The flags waved over our heads.
The flags waved above our heads.
But over can also mean coverning, or vertically above:
My father put a blanket over me.
There is a fan exactly over the table.

9. Below, under

Both below and under mean lower than and sometimes we can use either of them. But under means vertically below. It also has the idea of contact:
There was a beautiful lake below us in the valley.
His shoes were lying under the table.
She put the keys of the wardrobe under her pillow.

10. Into

Into denotes movement towards the interior of something:
He jumped into the well.
One stream flows into another.
Figuratively: We have entered into an agreement to export handicrafts to some European countries.

11. For

For is used to denote direction when the verb shows the beginning of a movement:
The children leaves for the school at 7 a.m.
We shall soon set off for Mumbai.

12. Against

Against shows pressure or contact:
He threw the goods against the wall.
Prepositions of direction from. Most common among these are: from, off, out of:

13. From

From is used with the point of departure:
He brought these books from the market.
He had already gone from home.

14. Out of

It is the opposite of into. It means from the interior of:
He took a few books out of the almirah